米兰体育

Skip to content
NOWCAST 米兰体育 13 6am Newscast
Live Now
Advertisement

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to give Elon Musk's DOGE access to Social Security systems

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to give Elon Musk's DOGE access to Social Security systems
THE JUDGE鈥橲 RULING FOCUSES ON PRIVACY ISSUES AND THE POSSIBLE MISUSE OF SENSITIVE INFORMATION. HEY HEY HO HO! ELON MUSK HAS GOT TO GO. EARLIER THIS WEEK, DEMONSTRATORS VOICED THEIR CONCERNS. AND NOW A JUDGE HAS RELEASED HER OPINION GRANTING A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. THE RULING FROM THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN MARYLAND BARS THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM DISCLOSING SENSITIVE PERSONAL DATA, INCLUDING MEDICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH INFORMATION, TO THE DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS ALREADY FILED THIS NOTICE OF APPEAL. IN HER OPINION, JUDGE ELLEN LIPTON HOLLANDER. EMPHASIZED SZA鈥橲 LONG STANDING COMMITMENT TO SAFEGUARDING PERSONAL DATA AND REJECTED THE ADMINISTRATION鈥橲 CLAIM THAT DOGE NEEDED ACCESS TO INVESTIGATE EFFICIENCY AND DETECT FRAUD. THE COURT RAISED CONCERNS ABOUT PRIVACY ACT VIOLATIONS AND THE RISK OF SENSITIVE DATA GETTING MISUSED. ALSO, UNAUTHORIZED PERSONNEL GRANTED ACCESS TO SENSITIVE DATA WITHOUT PROPER SECURITY CLEARANCE, TRAINING, OR ADHERENCE TO STANDARD SECURITY PROTOCOLS. IN THE JUDGE鈥橲 CONCLUSION, SHE WRITES, THE OBJECTIVE TO ADDRESS FRAUD, WASTE, MISMANAGEMENT, AND BLOAT IS LAUDABLE AND ONE THAT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC PRESUMABLY APPLAUDS AND SUPPORTS. BUT SHE ALSO THINKS THE PLAINTIFFS ARE ALSO LIKELY TO SUCCEED ON THEIR CLAIM THAT THE AGENCY鈥橲 ACTIONS ARE ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS, AND IN VIOLATION OF THE PRIVACY ACT AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT. RESPONDING TO THE COURT OPINION, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES UNION PRESIDENT LEE SAUNDERS SAYS THIS DECISION SENDS A CLEAR MESSAGE TO ELON MUSK AND HIS DOGE MINIONS TO KEEP THEIR HANDS OFF SOCIAL SECURITY. A SPOKESWOMAN FOR THE WHITE HOUSE SAYS WE WILL APPEAL THIS DECISION AND EXPECT ULTIMATE VICTORY ON THE ISSUE. THE RELEASE OF THE JUDGE鈥橲 RULING AND THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION鈥橲 APPEAL BOTH HAPPENED YESTERDAY. REPORTING FROM DOWNTOWN BALTIMORE BAR
Advertisement
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to give Elon Musk's DOGE access to Social Security systems
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Friday to clear the way for Elon Musk 鈥檚 Department of Government Efficiency to access Social Security systems containing personal data on millions of Americans.Related video above: A judge in Maryland recently ruled on DOGE access to sensitive informationThe emergency appeal is the first in a string of applications to the high court involving DOGE's swift-moving work across the federal government.It comes after a judge in Maryland restricted the team's access to Social Security under federal privacy laws. The agency holds personal records on nearly everyone in the country, including school records, bank details, salary information and medical and mental health records for disability recipients, according to court documents.The government says the DOGE team needs access to target waste in the federal government. Musk, now preparing to step back from his work with DOGE, has been focused on Social Security as an alleged hotbed of fraud. The billionaire entrepreneur has described it as a 鈥� Ponzi scheme 鈥� and insisted that reducing waste in the program is an important way to cut government spending.Solicitor General John Sauer argued Friday that the judge鈥檚 restrictions disrupt DOGE鈥檚 important work and inappropriately interfere with executive-branch decisions. 鈥淟eft undisturbed, this preliminary injunction will only invite further judicial incursions into internal agency decision-making,鈥� he wrote.He asked the justices to block the order from U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland as the lawsuit plays out.An appeals court previously refused to immediately to lift the block on DOGE access, though it split along ideological lines. Conservative judges in the minority said there鈥檚 no evidence that the team has done any 鈥渢argeted snooping鈥� or exposed personal information.The lawsuit was originally filed by a group of labor unions and retirees represented by the group Democracy Forward. The Supreme Court asked them for a response to the administration's appeal by May 12.More than two dozen lawsuits have been filed over DOGE's work, which has included deep cuts at federal agencies and large-scale layoffs.Video below: President Trump's first 100 days comes with legal challengesHollander found that DOGE's efforts at Social Security amounted to a 鈥渇ishing expedition鈥� based on 鈥渓ittle more than suspicion鈥� of fraud.Her order does allow staffers to access data that has been made anonymous, but the Trump administration has said DOGE can't work effectively with those restrictions.Elizabeth Laird with the nonprofit group Center for Democracy and Technology said wide-ranging access to sensitive personal data poses a serious threat. 鈥淚f DOGE gets a hold of this information, it opens the floodgates on a host of potential harms. It also normalizes a very dangerous practice for other federal agencies,鈥� she said.The nation's court system has been ground zero for pushback to President Donald Trump鈥檚 sweeping conservative agenda, with about 200 lawsuits filed challenging policies on everything from immigration to education to mass layoffs of federal workers.Among those that have reached the Supreme Court so far, the justices have handed down some largely procedural rulings siding with the administration but have rejected the government鈥檚 broad arguments in other cases.

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Friday to clear the way for Elon Musk 鈥檚 Department of Government Efficiency to access Social Security systems containing personal data on millions of Americans.

Related video above: A judge in Maryland recently ruled on DOGE access to sensitive information

Advertisement

The emergency appeal is the first in a string of applications to the high court involving DOGE's swift-moving work across the federal government.

It comes after a judge in Maryland restricted the team's access to Social Security under federal privacy laws. The agency holds personal records on nearly everyone in the country, including school records, bank details, salary information and medical and mental health records for disability recipients, according to court documents.

The government says the DOGE team needs access to target waste in the federal government. Musk, now preparing to step back from his work with DOGE, has been focused on Social Security as an alleged hotbed of fraud. The billionaire entrepreneur has described it as a 鈥� Ponzi scheme 鈥� and insisted that reducing waste in the program is an important way to cut government spending.

Solicitor General John Sauer argued Friday that the judge鈥檚 restrictions disrupt DOGE鈥檚 important work and inappropriately interfere with executive-branch decisions. 鈥淟eft undisturbed, this preliminary injunction will only invite further judicial incursions into internal agency decision-making,鈥� he wrote.

He asked the justices to block the order from U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland as the lawsuit plays out.

An appeals court previously refused to immediately to lift the block on DOGE access, though it split along ideological lines. Conservative judges in the minority said there鈥檚 no evidence that the team has done any 鈥渢argeted snooping鈥� or exposed personal information.

The lawsuit was originally filed by a group of labor unions and retirees represented by the group Democracy Forward. The Supreme Court asked them for a response to the administration's appeal by May 12.

More than two dozen lawsuits have been filed over DOGE's work, which has included deep cuts at federal agencies and large-scale layoffs.

Video below: President Trump's first 100 days comes with legal challenges

Hollander found that DOGE's efforts at Social Security amounted to a 鈥渇ishing expedition鈥� based on 鈥渓ittle more than suspicion鈥� of fraud.

Her order does allow staffers to access data that has been made anonymous, but the Trump administration has said DOGE can't work effectively with those restrictions.

Elizabeth Laird with the nonprofit group Center for Democracy and Technology said wide-ranging access to sensitive personal data poses a serious threat. 鈥淚f DOGE gets a hold of this information, it opens the floodgates on a host of potential harms. It also normalizes a very dangerous practice for other federal agencies,鈥� she said.

The nation's court system has been ground zero for pushback to President Donald Trump鈥檚 sweeping conservative agenda, with about 200 lawsuits filed challenging policies on everything from immigration to education to mass layoffs of federal workers.

Among those that have reached the Supreme Court so far, the justices have handed down some largely procedural rulings siding with the administration but have rejected the government鈥檚 broad arguments in other cases.