米兰体育

Skip to content
NOWCAST 米兰体育 13 6am Newscast
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Alabama House approves expanded immunity for law enforcement

Police sidearm and handcuffs
pixabay.com
Police sidearm and handcuffs
SOURCE: pixabay.com
AP logo
Updated: 7:16 PM CST Mar 7, 2025
Editorial Standards 鈸�
Advertisement
Alabama House approves expanded immunity for law enforcement
AP logo
Updated: 7:16 PM CST Mar 7, 2025
Editorial Standards 鈸�
The Alabama House of Representatives on Thursday approved enhanced legal protections for law enforcement officers after an emotional three-hour debate in which several Black lawmakers shared stories of encounters with police.Representatives voted 75-26 for the bill that is backed by Republican Gov. Kay Ivey. The bill now moves to the Alabama Senate. The proposal would call for an immunity hearing before a trial to determine whether the use of force, including deadly force, was justified. The bill says the use of force is justified if the officer acted within the law enforcement officer鈥檚 discretionary authority and if it does not does not constitute excessive force.Republican Rep. Rex Reynolds, a former police chief who sponsored the bill, said the officers have a split-second to make a decision. He said the immunity hearing will focus whether the officer acted within the scope of his duties or if he acted recklessly.鈥淗B202 will provide a sense of support from Alabama to these law enforcement officers when they make that decision.鈥� Reynolds said at the start of debate. An officer who acted improperly would be prosecuted, he said.The vote broke down along party lines, with Republicans voting favor of the bill and Democrats voting against it.Rep. Chris England, a Democrat from Tuscaloosa, said the bill would make 鈥減rosecuting police officers almost impossible.鈥滶ngland said he can recall only three cases over the last decade where a police officer faced prosecution for killing someone. He referenced cases in Montgomery, Huntsville and an upcoming trial in Decatur.鈥淭his bill is designed to make it harder to hold those officers 鈥� who commit acts like that 鈥� accountable,鈥� England said.During the sometimes contentious debate, Black lawmakers shared stories of encounters with police and conversations that they had with their children about traffic stops.Rep. Berry Forte, a Democrat from Eufaula, said he has seen 鈥渢oo much police brutality鈥� and said he feared the bill will give bad officers more freedom 鈥渢o pull the trigger on someone,鈥� Forte said.鈥淲e have to continue to worry about our boys and girls that look like me,鈥� Rep. Rolanda Hollis, a Democrat from Birmingham, told Reynolds. 鈥淪o that鈥檚 what my issue is. You鈥檝e never been pulled over because of the car you鈥檙e driving or because of the color of your skin.鈥漈he bill is part of a package of criminal justice bills backed by Ivey. The package also includes a ban on Glock switches. That bill was approved by the House on Thursday and is nearing final passage.

The Alabama House of Representatives on Thursday approved enhanced legal protections for law enforcement officers after an emotional three-hour debate in which several Black lawmakers shared stories of encounters with police.

Representatives voted 75-26 for that is backed by Republican Gov. Kay Ivey. The bill now moves to the Alabama Senate. The proposal would call for an immunity hearing before a trial to determine whether the use of force, including deadly force, was justified. The bill says the use of force is justified if the officer acted within the law enforcement officer鈥檚 discretionary authority and if it does not does not constitute excessive force.

Advertisement

Republican Rep. Rex Reynolds, a former police chief who sponsored the bill, said the officers have a split-second to make a decision. He said the immunity hearing will focus whether the officer acted within the scope of his duties or if he acted recklessly.

鈥淗B202 will provide a sense of support from Alabama to these law enforcement officers when they make that decision.鈥� Reynolds said at the start of debate. An officer who acted improperly would be prosecuted, he said.

The vote broke down along party lines, with Republicans voting favor of the bill and Democrats voting against it.

Rep. Chris England, a Democrat from Tuscaloosa, said the bill would make 鈥減rosecuting police officers almost impossible.鈥�

England said he can recall only three cases over the last decade where a police officer faced prosecution for killing someone. He referenced cases in and an upcoming trial in

鈥淭his bill is designed to make it harder to hold those officers 鈥� who commit acts like that 鈥� accountable,鈥� England said.

During the sometimes contentious debate, Black lawmakers shared stories of encounters with police and conversations that they had with their children about traffic stops.

Rep. Berry Forte, a Democrat from Eufaula, said he has seen 鈥渢oo much police brutality鈥� and said he feared the bill will give bad officers more freedom 鈥渢o pull the trigger on someone,鈥� Forte said.

鈥淲e have to continue to worry about our boys and girls that look like me,鈥� Rep. Rolanda Hollis, a Democrat from Birmingham, told Reynolds. 鈥淪o that鈥檚 what my issue is. You鈥檝e never been pulled over because of the car you鈥檙e driving or because of the color of your skin.鈥�

The bill is part of a package of criminal justice bills backed by Ivey. The package also includes a ban on Glock switches. That bill was approved by the House on Thursday and is nearing final passage.