米兰体育

Skip to content
NOWCAST 米兰体育 13 Morning News
Live Now
Advertisement

Prison porn ban: Iowa inmates suing for right to pornography

Prison porn ban: Iowa inmates suing for right to pornography
WEBVTT -- they want their porn back! They're challenging a new regulation banning pornographic magazines from state prisons. KCCI's Chris Gothner asked a legal expert if the inmates' lawsuit stands a chance -- and you might be surprised by the answer! The 26-page federal lawsuit -- is not your typical legal filing -- inmates at the Fort Dodge Correctional Instutition make references to Nazism , tyranny and the bible -- and say if female guards can't handle seeing porn -- quote "they should find employment elsewhere." But their suit argues that new state regulations -- spurred by a law requiring state prisons to ban porn and shut down so-called "pornographic reading rooms" -- is unconstitutional. Frequent prison litigator Allen Curtis Miles -- serving a life sentence for stabbing a Des Moines woman to death in 19-82 -- was joined by 57 other Fort Dodge inmates, asking to end the ban -- a $25-thousand dollars each. 30 years ago -- a federal judge struck down a ban on porn in Iowa prisons for being too vague -- the new rules began this month. Drake Constitutional Law professor Mark Kende says because the regulations are much more specific -- the current law is much more likely to be upheld. <34;45 BECAUSE OF THAT SPECIFICITY AND BC IT EXCLUDES EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL, IT MIGHT ACTUALLY BE OKAY> <35;09 PRISONERS GENERALLY HAVE RIGHTS TO ACCESS -- ABSENT SOME INCREDIBLY DANGEROUS PERSON -- READING MATERIALS -- AND THEY HAVE CONSTITUTIONA L RIGHTS EVEN THO THEY'RE IN PRISON, THE RIGHTS ARE DIMINISHED BUT THEY HAVE THEM. 35;23> The prisoners argue the new rules ban magazines like Playboy and even the Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition. Kende says their lawsuit may be inarticulate -- but unlike plenty of other prisoner- filed lawsuits he's seen over the years, it is not frivolous. <36;00 NUDITY DEFINITELY DOESN'T EQUAL OBSCENITY. SO THAT'S WHY THERE'S SOMETHING TO THE ARGUMENT THAT'S BEING MADE BY THESE PRISONERS THAT SOME OF THIS STUFF MIGHT BE PROTECTED. 36;10> He says ultimately -- all of this will be up for a judge to decide. A Department of Corrections spokesperson says the agency can't comment directly on pending litigation. If you'd like to read the rules -- and the lawsuit -- for yourself -- log on to the KCCI 8 news app
KCCI logo
Updated: 10:05 AM CST Nov 29, 2018
Editorial Standards 鈸�
Advertisement
Prison porn ban: Iowa inmates suing for right to pornography
KCCI logo
Updated: 10:05 AM CST Nov 29, 2018
Editorial Standards 鈸�
Some Iowa prisoners say they want their porn back and are challenging a new regulation banning pornographic magazines from state prisons. In the 26-page federal lawsuit, inmates at the Fort Dodge Correctional Institution make references to Nazism, tyranny and the Bible. They also say if female guards can't handle seeing pornographic images, "they should find employment elsewhere." The suit argues that new state regulations, spurred by a law requiring state prisons to ban porn and shut down so-called pornographic reading rooms, is unconstitutional.Frequent prison litigator Allen Curtis Miles, who is serving a life sentence for stabbing a Des Moines woman to death in 1982, was joined by 57 other Fort Dodge inmates, asking to end the ban and requesting $25,000 each.A federal judge struck down a ban on porn in Iowa prisons 30 years ago for being too vague. The rules began this month.Mark Kende, director of the Drake University Constitutional Law Center, said the regulations are much more specific, and the current law is much more likely to be upheld.鈥淏ecause of that specificity and because it excludes educational material, it might actually be OK,鈥� Kende said. 鈥淧risoners generally have rights to access -- absent some incredibly dangerous person -- (including) reading materials. And they have constitutional rights. Even though they鈥檙e in prison, the rights are diminished, but they have them.鈥� The prisoners argue the new rules ban magazines like Playboy and the Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition.Kende said their lawsuit may be inarticulate, but unlike plenty of other prisoner-filed lawsuits he's seen over the years, it is not frivolous.鈥淣udity definitely doesn鈥檛 equal obscenity, so that鈥檚 why there鈥檚 something to the argument that鈥檚 being made by these prisoners that some of this stuff might be protected,鈥� Kende said. Ultimately, it will be up for a judge to decide.A Department of Corrections spokesperson said the agency can't comment directly on pending litigation.

Some Iowa prisoners say they want their porn back and are challenging a new regulation banning pornographic magazines from state prisons.

, inmates at the Fort Dodge Correctional Institution make references to Nazism, tyranny and the Bible. They also say if female guards can't handle seeing pornographic images, "they should find employment elsewhere."

Advertisement

Related Content

The suit argues that new state regulations, spurred by a law requiring state prisons to ban porn and shut down so-called pornographic reading rooms, is unconstitutional.

米兰体育-TV

Frequent prison litigator Allen Curtis Miles, who is serving a life sentence for stabbing a Des Moines woman to death in 1982, was joined by 57 other Fort Dodge inmates, asking to end the ban and requesting $25,000 each.

A federal judge struck down a ban on porn in Iowa prisons 30 years ago for being too vague. The rules began this month.

Mark Kende, director of the Drake University Constitutional Law Center, said the regulations are much more specific, and the current law is much more likely to be upheld.

鈥淏ecause of that specificity and because it excludes educational material, it might actually be OK,鈥� Kende said. 鈥淧risoners generally have rights to access -- absent some incredibly dangerous person -- (including) reading materials. And they have constitutional rights. Even though they鈥檙e in prison, the rights are diminished, but they have them.鈥�

The prisoners argue the new rules ban magazines like Playboy and the Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition.

Kende said their lawsuit may be inarticulate, but unlike plenty of other prisoner-filed lawsuits he's seen over the years, it is not frivolous.

鈥淣udity definitely doesn鈥檛 equal obscenity, so that鈥檚 why there鈥檚 something to the argument that鈥檚 being made by these prisoners that some of this stuff might be protected,鈥� Kende said.

Ultimately, it will be up for a judge to decide.

A Department of Corrections spokesperson said the agency can't comment directly on pending litigation.