米兰体育

Skip to content
NOWCAST Weekday Morning Newscast
Live Now
Advertisement

New study finds Earth warming at record rate, but no evidence of climate change accelerating

New study finds Earth warming at record rate, but no evidence of climate change accelerating
LEIDNER, EARTH DAY. OF COURSE, A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO REFLECT ON THE HEALTH OF OUR PLANET. WHAT ARE YOU AT NASA SEEING WHEN IT COMES TO THE CHANGES ON LAND AND AT SEA? I THANK YOU AND HAPPY EARTH DAY. UM, OUR SATELLITES ARE ABLE TO GIVE US THIS INCREDIBLE VIEW OF OUR LAND AND OUR OCEAN AND OUR ATMOSPHERE, AND HOW THEY ARE ALL CONNECTED IN THIS INTRICATE KIND OF WAY. AND IT鈥橲 A REALLY PHENOMENAL WAY TO TO SEE NOT ONLY HOW IS EARTH CHANGING, BUT REALLY LEARN ABOUT WHY IS IT CHANGING AND WHAT DOES THAT MEAN FOR THE PEOPLE AND THE COMMUNITIES HERE IN THE UNITED STATES AND AROUND THE WORLD? SO OUR SATELLITES ARE ABLE TO GIVE US THESE INCREDIBLE VIEWS. OUR LATEST SATELLITE, CALLED PACE, GIVES US A VIEW NOT ONLY OF OUR OCEANS, BUT ALSO OF OUR ATMOSPHERE AS WELL. SO 2023, BEING ONE OF THE WARMEST YEARS ON RECORD ACROSS THE GLOBE AND HERE IN NEW ENGLAND, MANY FOLKS WILL PROBABLY REMEMBER FOR ALL OF THE RAIN AND FLOODING WE EXPERIENCED LAST SUMMER. PLUS, WE鈥橰E COMING OFF OF A LACK OF SNOW THIS WINTER. COULD YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT HOW THIS FITS INTO THE LONGER TUM TRENDS YOU鈥橰E SEEING? IN 2023 WAS THE HOTTEST YEAR ON RECORD, AND WHAT WE KNOW FROM LOOKING AT CLIMATE CHANGE AND UNDERSTANDING HOW GREENHOUSE GASES ARE CHANGING IN THE ATMOSPHERE, WE SEE THE IMPACTS IN ALL SORTS OF DIFFERENT WAYS, AND WE SEE THAT NOT ONLY THROUGH THE AVERAGE TEMPERATURE CHANGES AND FEELING JUST A LITTLE BIT HOTTER, BUT WE ALSO FEEL IT THROUGH EXTREMES THAT WE FEEL THESE CLIMATE IMPACTS IN ALL SORTS OF DIFFERENT WAYS. WE FEEL HEAT WAVES, WE FEEL EXTREME RAIN EVENTS, WE SEE A LACK OF SNOW. IN SOME CASES WE SEE DROUGHT IN SOME CASES. AND SO CLIMATE CHANGE IS REALLY ABLE TO BRING TOGETHER. WE鈥橰E REALLY ABLE TO SEE ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT KINDS OF IMPACTS. AND AND ALSO SEE HOW THEY鈥橰E CHANGING THROUGH TIME. SO DOCTOR LEIDNER, LET鈥橲 ACTUALLY CIRCLE BACK TO SOME OF THAT NEW TECHNOLOGY. NASA IS USING, INCLUDING YOUR NEW PACE SATELLITE. CAN YOU MAYBE TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THIS SATELLITE AND SOME OF THE FEATURES IT BRINGS TO THE TABLE? SURE. SO PACE WAS LAUNCHED IN EARLY FEBRUARY AND IT鈥橲 ALREADY GIVING US THESE AMAZING INSIGHTS INTO THE OCEAN AND IN THE ATMOSPHERE. PACE IS WHAT WE CALL A HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGER. AND SO WHAT THAT DOES IS IT ALLOWS US TO SEE SO MANY DIFFERENT COLORS IN THE OCEAN AND ALSO SO MANY DIFFERENT KINDS OF COLORS IN ESSENCE, IN THE ATMOSPHERE AS WELL. AND SO IN OUR OCEAN, WE USED TO BE ABLE TO SEE 3 OR 4 DIFFERENT COLORS WITH OUR SATELLITES, AND NOW WITH PACE, WE CAN ACTUALLY SEE LIKE 200 OVER 200 DIFFERENT COLORS. SO IT鈥橲 LETTING US SEE A WHOLE RAINBOW OF BLUES AND GREENS AND ALL SORTS OF OTHER COLORS THAT LET US SEE THE PHYTOPLANKTON IN THE OCEAN, PHYTOPLANKTON ARE THE BASE OF THE FOOD CHAIN. THEY鈥橰E LIKE, YOU KNOW, THEY鈥橰E THE VEGETATION OF THE OCEAN THAT HELPS SERVE AS THAT BASE. AND WE CAN SEE THESE DIFFERENT COLORS, AND WE CAN ALSO SEE HOW THEY鈥橰E CHANGING AND WHY THEY鈥橰E CHANGING. WE CAN SEE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF PHYTOPLANKTON. AND WE KNOW WHICH DIFFERENT KINDS OF ORGANISMS CAN EAT THOSE PHYTOPLANKTON. AND ALSO HOW THEY INTERACT WITH THE ATMOSPHERE AS WELL. AND IN THE AND IN THE ATMOSPHERE, WE CAN SEE ALL SORTS OF TINY PARTICLES CALLED AEROSOLS. AND THAT鈥橲 REALLY IMPORTANT BECAUSE AEROSOLS CAN AFFECT HUMAN HEALTH. THE AEROSOLS ARE THINGS LIKE SEA SALT, WILDFIRE SMOKE, DUST. AND SO WE CAN SEE NOT ONLY JUST KIND OF ARE THERE AEROSOLS IN THE ATMOSPHERE. AND HOW MANY THERE ARE, BUT WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT KINDS AND WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT SIZES. AND SO WE鈥橰E ABLE TO GET ALL OF THIS DETAIL ABOUT OUR OCEAN AND OUR ATMOSPHERE THAT WE WEREN鈥橳 ABLE TO SEE BEFORE. SOME FANTASTIC
Advertisement
New study finds Earth warming at record rate, but no evidence of climate change accelerating
The rate Earth is warming hit an all-time high in 2023 with 92% of last year's surprising record-shattering heat caused by humans, top scientists calculated.Video above: NASA scientist discusses changing climateThe group of 57 scientists from around the world used United Nations-approved methods to examine what's behind last year's deadly burst of heat. They said even with a faster warming rate they don't see evidence of significant acceleration in human-caused climate change beyond increased fossil fuel burning.Last year's record temperatures were so unusual that scientists have been debating what's behind the big jump and whether climate change is accelerating or if other factors are in play."If you look at this world accelerating or going through a big tipping point, things aren't doing that," study lead author Piers Forster, a Leeds University climate scientist, said. "Things are increasing in temperature and getting worse in sort of exactly the way we predicted."It's pretty much explained by the buildup of carbon dioxide from rising fossil fuel use, he and a co-author said.Last year the rate of warming hit 0.26 degrees Celsius (0.47 degrees Fahrenheit) per decade 鈥� up from 0.25 degrees Celsius (0.45 degrees Fahrenheit) the year before. That's not a significant difference, though it does make this year's rate the highest ever, Forster said.Still, outside scientists said this report highlights an ever more alarming situation."Choosing to act on climate has become a political talking point but this report should be a reminder to people that in fact it is fundamentally a choice to save human lives," said University of Wisconsin climate scientist Andrea Dutton, who wasn't part of the international study team. "To me, that is something worth fighting for."The team of authors 鈥� formed to provide annual scientific updates between the every seven- to eight-year major U.N. scientific assessments 鈥� determined last year was 1.43 degrees Celsius warmer than the 1850 to 1900 average with 1.31 degrees of that coming from human activity. The other 8% of the warming is due mostly to El Nino, the natural and temporary warming of the central Pacific that changes weather worldwide and also a freak warming along the Atlantic and just other weather randomness.On a larger 10-year time frame, which scientists prefer to single years, the world has warmed about 1.19 degrees Celsius (2.14 degrees Fahrenheit) since pre-industrial times, the report in the journal Earth System Science Data found.The report also said that as the world keeps using coal, oil and natural gas, Earth is likely to reach the point in 4.5 years that it can no longer avoid crossing the internationally accepted threshold for warming: 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit ).That fits with earlier studies projecting Earth being committed or stuck to at least 1.5 degrees by early 2029 if emission trajectories don't change. The actual hitting of 1.5 degrees could be years later, but it would be inevitable if all that carbon is used, Forster said.It's not the end of the world or humanity if temperatures blow past the 1.5 limit, but it will be quite bad, scientists said. Past U.N. studies show massive changes to Earth's ecosystem are more likely to kick in between 1.5 and 2 degrees Celsius of warming, including eventual loss of the planet's coral reefs, Arctic sea ice, species of plants and animals 鈥� along with nastier extreme weather events that kill people.Last year's temperature rise was more than just a little jump. It was especially unusual in September, said study co-author Sonia Seneviratne, head of land-climate dynamics at ETH Zurich, a Swiss university.The year was within the range of what was predicted, albeit it was at the upper edge of the range, Seneviratne said."Acceleration if it were to happen would be even worse, like hitting a global tipping point, it would be probably the worst scenario," Seneviratne said. "But what is happening is already extremely bad and it is having major impacts already now. We are in the middle of a crisis."University of Michigan environment dean Jonathan Overpeck and Berkeley Earth climate scientist Zeke Hausfather, neither of whom were part of the study, said they still see acceleration. Hausfather pointed out the rate of warming is considerably higher than 0.18 degrees Celsius (0.32 Fahrenheit) per decade of warming that it was between 1970 and 2010.Scientists had theorized a few explanations for the massive jump in September, which Hausfather called "gobsmacking." Wednesday's report didn't find enough warming from other potential causes. The report said the reduction of sulfur pollution from shipping 鈥� which had been providing some cooling to the atmosphere 鈥� was overwhelmed last year by carbon particles put in the air from Canadian wildfires.The report also said an undersea volcano that injected massive amounts of heat-trapping water vapor into the atmosphere also spewed cooling particles with both forces pretty much canceling each other out.Texas Tech climate scientist and chief scientist at the Nature Conservancy Katharine Hayhoe said "The future is in our hands. It's us 鈥� not physics, but humans 鈥� who will determine how quickly the world warms and by how much."

The rate Earth is warming hit an all-time high in 2023 with 92% of last year's surprising record-shattering heat caused by humans, top scientists calculated.

Video above: NASA scientist discusses changing climate

Advertisement

The group of 57 scientists from around the world used United Nations-approved methods to examine what's behind last year's deadly burst of heat. They said even with a faster warming rate they don't see evidence of significant acceleration in human-caused climate change beyond increased fossil fuel burning.

Last year's record temperatures were so unusual that scientists have been debating what's behind the big jump and whether climate change is accelerating or if other factors are in play.

"If you look at this world accelerating or going through a big tipping point, things aren't doing that," study lead author Piers Forster, a Leeds University climate scientist, said. "Things are increasing in temperature and getting worse in sort of exactly the way we predicted."

It's pretty much explained by the buildup of carbon dioxide from rising fossil fuel use, he and a co-author said.

Last year the rate of warming hit 0.26 degrees Celsius (0.47 degrees Fahrenheit) per decade 鈥� up from 0.25 degrees Celsius (0.45 degrees Fahrenheit) the year before. That's not a significant difference, though it does make this year's rate the highest ever, Forster said.

Still, outside scientists said this report highlights an ever more alarming situation.

"Choosing to act on climate has become a political talking point but this report should be a reminder to people that in fact it is fundamentally a choice to save human lives," said University of Wisconsin climate scientist Andrea Dutton, who wasn't part of the international study team. "To me, that is something worth fighting for."

The team of authors 鈥� formed to provide annual scientific updates between the every seven- to eight-year major U.N. scientific assessments 鈥� determined last year was 1.43 degrees Celsius warmer than the 1850 to 1900 average with 1.31 degrees of that coming from human activity. The other 8% of the warming is due mostly to El Nino, the natural and temporary warming of the central Pacific that changes weather worldwide and also a freak warming along the Atlantic and just other weather randomness.

On a larger 10-year time frame, which scientists prefer to single years, the world has warmed about 1.19 degrees Celsius (2.14 degrees Fahrenheit) since pre-industrial times, the report in the journal Earth System Science Data found.

The report also said that as the world keeps using coal, oil and natural gas, Earth is likely to reach the point in 4.5 years that it can no longer avoid crossing the internationally accepted threshold for warming: 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit ).

That fits with earlier studies projecting Earth being committed or stuck to at least 1.5 degrees by early 2029 if emission trajectories don't change. The actual hitting of 1.5 degrees could be years later, but it would be inevitable if all that carbon is used, Forster said.

It's not the end of the world or humanity if temperatures blow past the 1.5 limit, but it will be quite bad, scientists said. Past U.N. studies show massive changes to Earth's ecosystem are more likely to kick in between 1.5 and 2 degrees Celsius of warming, including eventual loss of the planet's coral reefs, Arctic sea ice, species of plants and animals 鈥� along with nastier extreme weather events that kill people.

Last year's temperature rise was more than just a little jump. It was especially unusual in September, said study co-author Sonia Seneviratne, head of land-climate dynamics at ETH Zurich, a Swiss university.

The year was within the range of what was predicted, albeit it was at the upper edge of the range, Seneviratne said.

"Acceleration if it were to happen would be even worse, like hitting a global tipping point, it would be probably the worst scenario," Seneviratne said. "But what is happening is already extremely bad and it is having major impacts already now. We are in the middle of a crisis."

University of Michigan environment dean Jonathan Overpeck and Berkeley Earth climate scientist Zeke Hausfather, neither of whom were part of the study, said they still see acceleration. Hausfather pointed out the rate of warming is considerably higher than 0.18 degrees Celsius (0.32 Fahrenheit) per decade of warming that it was between 1970 and 2010.

Scientists had theorized a few explanations for the massive jump in September, which Hausfather called "gobsmacking." Wednesday's report didn't find enough warming from other potential causes. The report said the reduction of sulfur pollution from shipping 鈥� which had been providing some cooling to the atmosphere 鈥� was overwhelmed last year by carbon particles put in the air from Canadian wildfires.

The report also said an undersea volcano that injected massive amounts of heat-trapping water vapor into the atmosphere also spewed cooling particles with both forces pretty much canceling each other out.

Texas Tech climate scientist and chief scientist at the Nature Conservancy Katharine Hayhoe said "The future is in our hands. It's us 鈥� not physics, but humans 鈥� who will determine how quickly the world warms and by how much."